Do your thing

 Posted by Anastasia on January 6, 2011  No Responses »
Jan 062011
 
Share

White Springs School 5th graders dancing: White Springs, Florida

From Smugglivus 2010: Airing of Grievances:

We have seen myriad posts about Blogging Rules around the Internets last year and we tried to stay away from the conversation as much as we could – because, frankly, these posts are typically made of…GAAH. List after list of what a blogger should or should not do: how to behave, how to contact who and when, how to get ARCs, how NOT to blog for ARCs, how publishers CARE about what we do, how publishers DO NOT care about what we do, how being concerned about hits is WRONG, how Marketing is EVIL, how doing giveaways and blog tours are akin to skinning one’s cat, how we need to be more critical, how we need to be less critical, how blogging should be FUN, how blogging should be PROFESSIONAL.

Wanna know what we think? You gotta do what you gotta do, dudes. Forget what other people say and do your thing. That’s all.

Share
 
Share

Welcome to the first installment of Classroom Takeover, a new monthly feature! Every month, a new blogger creates an ideal college class featuring a subject, author, or genre that they think doesn’t get enough attention in mainstream college classes.

For my class, I decided to focus on something that I really enjoy reading: children’s literature from 1900-1950!

Intro

Children’s literature, like all other forms of literature, went through different stages in its history. In the late Victorian era, children’s literature really started to be written for children. Previously, “children’s books” were more like books that had been written for adults but could feasibly cross over into the kidlit sphere as well. Even the Grimm fairy tales were originally written for adults, and only became children’s stories later on. By the time the Victorian era was spreading into the Edwardian and later eras, however, children’s literature as a genre was starting to really take off.

The children’s books that appeared from 1900-1950 are arguably some of the most important books ever produced, not only because of their cultural and literary merit but also because of their impact on the generations of children who read them. Furthermore, the adults who were writing the books included their own understanding of the world they lived in within their texts, and they passed that understanding down to their readers (whether the readers even knew of the hidden messages or not). Children’s literature is so much more than a mere comforting blanket to retreat to when the world gets too tough; it is also a reflection of the times and the people that created it, and a thorough examination of the major trends in early 20th century children’s lit along with the more usual adult literature studies is desperately needed. Continue reading »

Share

On rereading (or not)

 Posted by Anastasia on January 4, 2011  21 Responses »
Jan 042011
 
Share

i'd reread a lot more books if they were cats
see more Lolcats and funny pictures

Something Jenny said on Sunday made me think about my reading habits over the past several years. Before I started this blog I used to reread a lot more. Mostly I think this was because a) I had a lot less unread books in my collection, b) I didn’t have a job so my intake of new books was a lot less than it is now, and c) I felt safe in rereading the same books over and over again. I can sort of remember somewhere around 2008 deciding to NOT reread so many of the same books because while I enjoyed them I was getting into a rut.

Somewhere around the same time I finally worked up the courage to use my campus’ library, and then I got a job, and I have been rereading very little ever since. Continue reading »

Share
Jan 032011
 
Share


I don’t know about you, but my college reading was filled with, mostly, dead white people, with an occasional PoC sneaking in. Also, most of my lit classes were boring. Later American Lit? Dead white men. Early British lit? Dead white men. Shakespeare? Okay, I like Shakespeare, but he’s a dead white dude. And so’s Marlowe, for that matter– the other “choice” we English majors had in our “focused author class requirement.”

But my classes weren’t all bad! Some of the best classes I had were in the upper levels, where profs had a bit more leniency in picking a topic and a corresponding reading list. I especially liked ones that focused on an unusual topic, like my Utopias/Dystopias class. We had authors of all colors, genders and lifestyles in that class, and it was a lot of fun! It was also really rare, as even the other “fun” classes were full of the same lit canon as the “non-fun” classes. It made me realize that I was missing out on a lot of great literature because the majority of my profs were so used to sticking to the dead white guys standard.

After graduating from college this past December, I got to thinking. What great non-dead white guy literature have I missed out on? What new genres or authors or stories could I be learning about? And who can help me get introduced to these books? Continue reading »

Share
Jan 022011
 
Share

The Sunday Salon (January 2)

The Sunday Salon.com So it’s that time where I make a list of things I’m going to try to achieve in the course of the year, and where I look back at 2010′s resolutions and see if I did what I wanted to do. Huzzah! First, a look back at 2010′s goals: Continue reading »

Share
Jan 012011
 
Share

Previously: Part 1: Stats

I actually don’t have any trouble making lists of my favorite books, but I do tend to have a hard time containing myself to only two or three lists, mostly because I come up with really weird and arbitrary ways of picking which book should go where and I need about a million categories to get them all properly sorted, etc. etc. But I’ve tried really hard this time to not do that! So for this second part of my wrapping-things-up segment I’ve got two lists. Continue reading »

Share